शौनकचा कट्टा..

विद्यार्थी.. या नावात, संकल्पनेतच एक ऊर्जा आहे. प्रश्न विचारणारी, बंडखोरी करणारी ऊर्जा आहे.  पारंपरिक भारतीय शिक्षणपद्धती शैक्षणिक परिप्रेक्ष्यात प्रश्न विचारण्याला, बंडखोरीला उत्तेजन आहे. भारतीय शिक्षणपद्धतीत गहन विषय गुरू-शिष्यांमधील प्रश्नोत्तरांतूनच उलगडत गेले आहेत.  काळ पुढे सरकत गेला तसं विद्यार्थ्यांमधील बंडखोरीच्या कक्षा विस्तारल्या. विद्यार्थ्यांच्या प्रश्नांसोबतच अधिक व्यापक राजकीय, सामाजिक मुद्द्यांवर विद्यार्थीप्रणित आंदोलने जगभर झाली. काही यशस्वी, काही अयशस्वी तर काही नव्या व्यवस्थेला जन्म देणाऱ्या चळवळी जन्माला आल्या.  स्वातंत्र्याच्या पूर्वसंध्येला महात्मा गांधींनी 'स्वतंत्र भारताच्या सरकारांनी योग्य कारभार केला नाही तर स्वतंत्र भारतात जन्माला आलेली पिढी या व्यवस्थेला प्रश्न विचारणार, त्याविरुद्ध बंड करून उठणार. त्यावेळी मी त्या पिढीच्या पाठीशी उभा राहीन.' असे वक्तव्य केले होते.  त्याप्रमाणे खरोखरच स्वतंत्र भारतात जन्माला आलेल्या पिढीने, त्यातही मुख्यतः एका जनआंदोलनाची सुरुवात केली. त्या विद्यार्थी चळवळीची ठिणगी पाहता पाहता मोठी झाली आणि आणीबाणीच्या मा...

  Studenthood, by its very name, embodies energy, an energy that questions, challenges, and rebels.  The spirit of inquiry has always been central to the Indian tradition of learning. Classical Indian education did not discourage dissent; rather, it nurtured it. Profound philosophical ideas were explored and refined through dialogues between teachers and disciples, where questioning was regarded as an essential path to knowledge. As society evolved, the scope of student dissent expanded beyond academic concerns. Students increasingly began questioning broader political and social issues, giving rise to movements that reshaped nations across the world. Some succeeded in achieving their objectives, others faded away, while a few fundamentally transformed political systems. On the eve of Bharat's Independence, Mahatma Gandhi had remarked that if the governments of a free Bharat failed to govern justly, the generation born after Independence would question and challenge the system...

  वर्ष १९५६. सुवेझ कालव्याने ऊर्जा भू-राजकारणाचा समतोल पूर्णपणे बदलून टाकला. ब्रिटन आणि फ्रान्सने सुवेझ कालवा ताब्यात घेण्याचा प्रयत्न केला. इस्राएलने युद्धात विजय मिळवला खरा पण या सगळ्यात ब्रिटन-फ्रान्सचे हकनाक नाक कापले गेले. भुराजकारणाचा ध्रुव अमेरिकेकडे सरकला.  अमेरिकेचे तत्कालीन राष्ट्राध्यक्ष ड्वाइट डी. आयसेनहॉवर म्हणाले होते, "अँथनी ईडन (ब्रिटनचे पंतप्रधान) इतके मूर्खपणाचे कृत्य करतील, यावर विश्वास बसत नाही." या एका वाक्यात पश्चिम आशियात युरोप नाही तर अमेरिका-इस्राएलचे वर्चस्व स्थापित झाल्याचे जणू घोषित झाले होते. आता जवळजवळ सात दशकानंतर हा प्रदेश पुन्हा एकदा धुमसतो आहे. इस्राएल-अमेरिकेने इराणवर हल्ले सुरु केले. प्रत्युत्तर म्हणून इराणने पश्चिम आशियातील अरब देशांवर हल्ले केले. होर्मूझच्या सामुद्रधुनीतून कच्च्या तेलाच्या जागतिक वाहतुकीपैकी एक पंचमांश वाहतूक होते. त्या सामुद्रधुनीवर आणि त्यातील व्यापारी मार्गावर नियंत्रण राखण्याची क्षमता इराणकडे आहे, आणि तोच सगळ्यात मोठा हुकुमाचा पत्ता खेळला.  होर्मूझची सामुद्रधुनी बंद करुन जगाच्या नाकी नऊ आणले आहेत. यामुळे जागतिक ऊर...

The modern geopolitics of energy was irreversibly shaped in 1956 at the Suez Canal. What began as an attempt by Britain and France to reclaim imperial control ended in strategic humiliation. The Suez Crisis not only marked the decline of European colonial power, but also announced the arrival of the United States as the dominant Western force in global affairs. In the aftermath of the crisis, a frustrated Dwight D. Eisenhower is said to have remarked of British Prime Minister Anthony Eden, “I just can’t believe that Anthony Eden is so stupid.” The bluntness captured a deeper truth: the age of European strategic autonomy had collapsed, replaced by American primacy. Over the decades, this dominance evolved into a firm strategic axis with Israel, shaping the politics of West Asia. Nearly seven decades later, the region is once again at the center of global turbulence. Escalating tensions involving Iran, targeted strikes, and the ever-present threat to the Strait of Hormuz have revived con...

  While examining the Indian nation through the concept of “parampara” (tradition) as articulated by Prof. Ram Shevalkar, the second part traced the traditions of Vashistha and Vishwamitra in the context of the question: the path of knowledge or the path of statecraft? In this part, we will examine another question, stability or dynamism, that is, “To be Static or to Adopt Dynamism” through the traditions of Bhargava and Narayaniya. Bhargav or Bhrigu:  Sage Bhrigu, like Vashistha, is also considered a Manasaputra of Brahma. According to Indian Puranic literature, these sages are born again in different Manvantaras. According to the Vishnu Purana, in the first Manvantara Bhrigu married Khyati. They had children such as Ayati, Niyati, and Bhargavi (Lakshmi). Among them, Lakshmi was married to Vishnu. According to the Shiva Purana, after the episode of Daksha Yajna and Sati, Bhrigu received a boon that he would be reborn in the Chakshusha Manvantara. Accordingly, he was reborn ...

While examining the idea of the Indian nation through the concept of “Parampara” as articulated by Prof. Ram Shevalkar, in the first we part briefly reviewed India as a civilization and culture, and concluded by identifying the Parampara that form its foundation. These Parampara are Vashistha, Vishwamitra, Bhargava, and Narayaniya. In this part, we shall explore Vashistha and Vishwamitra Parampara with the question: Is the path of the nation guided primarily by the path of knowledge or by the path of statecraft and power? Vashishtha: Sage Vashistha, considered the Manasaputra  of Brahma, is the bearer of the Brahmadanda, the staff of spiritual authority, and the embodiment of knowledge. He is counted among the 21 Prajapatis and served as the Rajpurohit  (Royal Preceptor) of the Ikshvaku dynasty of Lord Rama. Vashishtha Following the command of King Dasharatha, Sage Vashistha imparted guidance to Rama and Lakshmana on justice, ethics, and the principles of an ideal state. Thi...